Sim ou nÃo? Os discursos do Referendo 2005

AUTOR(ES)
DATA DE PUBLICAÇÃO

2009

RESUMO

This work reaches to comprehend the movement of senses on the elections about the commercial sale of firearms and ammunition that happened in 2005. Thus, itâs used, as a theoretical support, French Discourse Analysis that shows itself as a discipline capable of contain the ideological questions, linguistics and terms of text production. The politicians discoursesâ analysis of the Referendum 2005 is found exactly in that entercrossing. The corpus chosen is the three major weeks magazines of information in Brazil : Veja , Isto à e Ãpoca. Each one with a political position well-defined in dispute determined the construction of meaning in discourse yes and no and also of what havenât being said, but continued standing for. The main objective of this work is to understand the many effects of meaning that appears on the discourse of / about the Referendum 2005 taking into consideration the recollection discourse, the interdiscourse and the different discourse formations. By the analyze, it is possible to observe that there is a intense dialog among the three magazines and the line that separates the two antagonistic speeches is too tenuous. Initially put in opposite positions and irreconcilable, it is possible to identify that yes and the no have many points of contact. Those discourses rivaled among themselves and unchained a strong polemic in society. What was finally understood was a discoursive war which the senses ran from one side to another in a uninterrupted process of ( rebuilding ) and (re) significance

ASSUNTO(S)

polemic comunicacao discurso nÃo referendo 2005 discourse yes firearms - laws armas de fogo - legislaÃÃo anÃlise do discurso polÃtico referendum 2005 discurso sim polÃmica discourse no analysis of the political discourse

ACESSO AO ARTIGO

Documentos Relacionados