The biological effects of diagnostic cardiac imaging on chronically exposed physicians: the importance of being non-ionizing

AUTOR(ES)

Andreassi, Maria Grazia

FONTE

BioMed Central

RESUMO

Ultrasounds and ionizing radiation are extensively used for diagnostic applications in the cardiology clinical practice. This paper reviewed the available information on occupational risk of the cardiologists who perform, every day, cardiac imaging procedures. At the moment, there are no consistent evidence that exposure to medical ultrasound is capable of inducing genetic effects, and representing a serious health hazard for clinical staff. In contrast, exposure to ionizing radiation may result in adverse health effect on clinical cardiologists. Although the current risk estimates are clouded by approximations and extrapolations, most data from cytogenetic studies have reported a detrimental effect on somatic DNA of professionally exposed personnel to chronic low doses of ionizing radiation. Since interventional cardiologists and electro-physiologists have the highest radiation exposure among health professionals, a major awareness is crucial for improving occupational protection. Furthermore, the use of a biological dosimeter could be a reliable tool for the risk quantification on an individual basis.

Documentos Relacionados

• Cataract after exposure to non-ionizing radiant energy.
• Effects of Non-Ionizing Radiation on Expansion of Disks From Leaves of Dark-Grown Bean Plants 12
• Non-Ionizing Radiation Analysis in Close Proximity to Antenna Tower: A Case Study in Northeast Brazil
• The effects of change in method of paying physicians: the Baltimore experience.
• Exposure to non-ionizing radiation emitted by microwave therapeutic equipment and morbidity in physiotherapists