Ethics roundtable debate: should a sedated dying patient be wakened to say goodbye to family?

AUTOR(ES)

Batchelor, Anna

FONTE

BioMed Central

RESUMO

Intensivists have the potential to maintain vital signs almost indefinitely, but not necessarily the potential to make moribund patients whole. Current ethical and legal mandates push patient autonomy to the forefront of care plans. When patients are incapable of expressing their preferences, surrogates are given proxy. It is unclear how these preferences extend to the very brink of inevitable death. Some say that patients should have the opportunity and authority to direct their death spiral. Others say it would be impossible for them to do so because an inevitable death spiral cannot be effectively palliated. Humane principles dictate they be spared the unrelenting discomfort surrounding death. The present case examines such a patient and the issues surrounding a unique end-of-life decision.

Documentos Relacionados

• Ethics roundtable debate: Withdrawal of tube feeding in a patient with persistent vegetative state where the patients wishes are unclear and there is family dissension
• Ethics roundtable debate: Child with severe brain damage and an underlying brain tumour
• Debate: Albumin administration should not be avoided
• Pro/con ethics debate: Should mechanical ventilation be continued to allow for progression to brain death so that organs can be donated?
• Debate: Albumin administration should be avoided in the critically ill