Estudo da citologia oncótica convencional e da detecção do DNA-HPV pela captura de híbridos II no rastreamento primário de lesões pré-neoplasicas e neoplásicas cervicais / Study of conventional cytology oncótica and the detention of the dna-hpv for the capture of hybrids ii in the primary tracking of cervical injuries pré-neoplásicas and neoplásicas

AUTOR(ES)
DATA DE PUBLICAÇÃO

2005

RESUMO

Objective: to compare the usual Pap smear (Papanicolaou) and the Hybrid Capture II tests in detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women of Ceara State. Subjects and Methods: 1685 women were enrolled from routine practice in five municipalities of the main Ceará State Health Regions. The whole study was explained to the volunteers, who accepted to participate by signing an informed consent form. The study procedures included filling a questionaire and a cervical sample collection, done by a physician, for cytology and HPV-DNA Hybrid Capture, followed by a complete colposcopic evaluation with directed biopsy if necessary. Data were analyzed in Statistical Package for Social Sciences - SPSS - for Windows 10.0. The accuracy of both tests Pap smear and Hybrid Capture II - was evaluated by using the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and the respective 95% confidence intervals. The negative colposcopic examination or negative histological result were considered gold standard for negative results. Positive histological results were considered gold standard for positive results. Results: 56 women (3,4%) had abnormal pap smear. Hybrid Capture tests were positive in 315 women (19%). Despite 337 (20,32%) tests had positive results for one of the two tests, only 19 (1,1%) were positive in both tests. Lesions were detected in 53 women among those 150 considered positive in colposcopic examination. The prevalence for any lesion was estimated in 3,2% and for high grade lesions and cancer in 0,4%. Using the cut-off point as the finding of any cervical lesion, the sensitivity of pap smear and HC II was 30,2% and 71,7%, respectively. The specificity for pap smear and HC II was 97,5% and 82,7%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive value for pap smear was 28,6% and 97,7%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive value for HC II was 12,1% and 98,9%, respectively. By using the cut-off value as high grade cervical lesions and cancer, the sensitivity and specificity for pap smear were 28,6% and 99,9%, respectively, and the positive predictive value and negative predictive value for the same test were 54,8% and 99,7%. The sensitivity and specificity for HC II were 100% and 81,3%, respectively, as well as 2,2% and 100% for positive and negative predictive value. Conclusions: hybrid Capture II test was more sensitive than pap smear, however Hybrid Capture II test was less specific than pap smear. When both tests were used together for detecting cervical lesions the results improved significantly, mainly high grade lesion and cancer. For this group of lesions, HC II alone, presented better specificity, without loss of the sensitivity, apparently its a good test for primary sceening.

ASSUNTO(S)

neoplasia intra-epitelial cervical papilomavírus humano papillomavirus humano citologia pap smear citologia oncótica human papillomavirus captura híbrida hybrid capture ginecologia e obstetricia cervix neoplasm esfregaço vaginal neoplasias do colo do Útero prevenção de câncer de colo uterino

ACESSO AO ARTIGO

Documentos Relacionados