Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface treatments in dog bone
AUTOR(ES)
Kim, Sun-Jong, Kim, Myung-Rae, Rim, Jae-Suk, Chung, Sung-Min, Shin, Sang-Wan
FONTE
Journal of Applied Oral Science
DATA DE PUBLICAÇÃO
2010-08
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the effects of different implant surface treatments on implant stability in dog mandibles. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 30 implants (Dentium Co, Seoul, Korea) were placed in 5 dog mandibles. Bone quality was assessed at each site. Implant stability was evaluated using 2 different methods. An OsstellTM resonance frequency analyzer (RFA) was used to determine the stability at baseline (day 1), and 3, 6 and 10 weeks after surgery. Animals were euthanized 10 weeks after implant installation. Specimens were obtained and submitted to the laboratory processing. Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for histologic and histomorphometric analyses. All implantation sites in dog mandibles demonstrated bone types II and III. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: All implants showed good primary stability at baseline in terms of insertion torque. The results of this study suggest that surface treatment may have significant effects on biological stability 3 weeks after implant placement. Further studies are needed to confirm these initial observations in poor quality bone.
Documentos Relacionados
- A comparison of different bone graft materials in peri-implant guided bone regeneration
- Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets after different pre-treatments in porcelain surface
- Effect of implant design and bone density in primary stability
- Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontics brackets on composite resin restorations with different surface treatments
- Influence of the growth pattern on cortical bone thickness and mini-implant stability