Comparação entre protocolos de marcadores anatomicos e tecnicos para analise cinematica na marcha e na corrida / Comparison of technical and anatomical markers protocols for kinematical analysis in the walking and in the running

AUTOR(ES)
DATA DE PUBLICAÇÃO

2007

RESUMO

The purpose of this study was to compare two protocols for kinematical analysis of sprinters according to velocities, body segments and joint angles during walking and running. The first protocol uses retroreflective markers mounted on fixtures attached to the body segment and the second uses retroreflective markers directly located on the skin surface. Six male athletes were studied during treadmill running at 5 and 20 Km/h and recorded with eight 120 Hz video cameras. A three-dimensional model constituted by fifteen segments represented the sprinters: head, thorax, pelvis, the right and left feet, shanks, thighs, scapulas, arms and forearms. The calibration of the cameras, the synchronization of the registrations and the 3D reconstruction of the coordinates of the markers were done in the Dvideo ® software. All data were analyzed using Matlab® 7.0. The results show that the variability of the length of the segments and of the distances between the markers and the maximum difference maximum between the angles obtained by each protocol were higher with the increase of the velocities, showing that the errors in the analysis of the movement during the running were larger than these ones during the gait. There was no effect of the velocities in the correlation between the angles obtained by each protocol. The variability of the distances between the markers in the lower limb were higher than this one in the upper limbs and the variability of the length of the shank was higher than this one in the other segments. The results also showed a higher correlation was found between the flexion/extension angles (0,99) obtained by each protocol and for each joint, followed by the abduction/adduction angles (0,78) and the angles of internal/external rotation (0,65). The lower values found in the maximum angular difference were between the flexion/extension angles (6,3° ± 3,4°) obtained by each protocol and for each articulation, followed by the abduction/adduction angles (13,2° ± 7,9°) and the angles of internal/external rotation (17,2° ± 8,4°). No differences were found in the variability of the length of the segments and also in the analysis of the angular kinematics, however the adduction/abduction and internal/external rotation angles should be regarded with much more caution

ASSUNTO(S)

upper and lower extremity membros superiores marcha running kinematics membros inferiores corrida euler angles

ACESSO AO ARTIGO

Documentos Relacionados