An experimental evaluation of continuous normothermic, intermittent hypothermic, and intermittent normothermic coronary perfusion
AUTOR(ES)
Brown, A. Hedley
RESUMO
Hedley Brown, A., Braimbridge, M. V., Darracott, Sally, Chayen, J., and Kasap, H. (1974).Thorax, 29, 38-50. An experimental evaluation of continuous normothermic, intermittent hypothermic, and intermittent normothermic coronary perfusion. Coronary perfusion and hypothermia both have disadvantages, and excellent clinical results are obtained without them, though short operations, spontaneous cooling of unperfused hearts, hyperglycaemia, heparinization, and young and cyanotic subjects may allow more tolerance of ischaemia. Functional, macroscopic, histological, ultrastructural, chemical, and metabolic evidence of the inadvisability of ischaemia, especially of hypertrophied hearts, abounds, though statistical support and histochemical proof are lacking.
ACESSO AO ARTIGO
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=470402Documentos Relacionados
- Evidence that continuous normothermic blood cardioplegia offers better myocardial protection than intermittent hypothermic cardioplegia.
- The Results and Complications of Hypothermic Perfusion
- The Technique of Hypothermic Perfusion
- Elective Circulatory Arrest with Continuous Coronary Perfusion During Neurosurgical Operations
- Effect of hypothermic perfusion on corneal endothelial morphology.
