Achados ultrassonográficos em lesões de bifurcação coronária tratadas com stent único versus estratégia com dois stents / Intravascular ultrasound findings in coronary bifurcation lesions treated with single stenting versus double stenting strategies

AUTOR(ES)
FONTE

IBICT - Instituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciência e Tecnologia

DATA DE PUBLICAÇÃO

10/08/2011

RESUMO

Previous comparative studies including selected bifurcation lesions have shown no advantage of elective double stenting implantation versus single stenting. However, the applicability of the provisional technique appears to be dependent on the bifurcation lesion complexity. The lesion luminal area after percutaneous treatment, as assessed by intravascular ultrasound, has demonstrated significant predictive value in the late follow-up of patients undergoing PCI. The objectives of this analysis were to evaluate the lesion luminal dimensions of complex coronary bifurcation lesions, as assessed by intravascular ultrasound, and to correlate such findings with acute and late outcomes. Also, it was aimed to identify angiographic and intravascular ultrasound predictors of side branch failure throughout the procedural steps and follow-up. Between may 2008 and august 2009, 59 patients with complex bifurcation lesions, including significant involvement (>50% stenosis) of both branches and side branch lesion length extending from its ostium, were approached initially with side branch predilatation, which was successful (<50% stenosis, TIMI 3 flow, no dissection) in 54 patients (91.5%). These patients were then randomized for treatment with single stenting (provisional strategy) (n = 27) versus double stenting (n = 27). During procedure, 6 patients allocated in the single stenting arm presented side branch failure (>50% residual stenosis, TIMI flow <3 or dissection), given that 5 patients received an additional stent in the side branch in order to optimize the angiographic result. At final procedure, the mean value and standard deviation (SD) for minimum lumen area at the side branch ostium (primary endpoint) were 3.37 (1.62) mm2 in single stenting versus 5.50 (1.41) mm2 in double stenting (p <0.001), according to the randomized allocation. In the angiographic follow-up at 9 months, the restenosis rates in the side branch were 21.7% in single stenting versus 4% in double stenting (p = 0.06), given that all recurrences involved the ostial location. Considering the treatment received, the side branch restenosis rate was significantly increase among patients treated with single stenting versus double stenting (27.8% versus 3.3%, p = 0.01). The predictors of provisional strategy failure were: lesion eccentricity (p = 0.02), minimum lumen area (p = 0.08) and minimum lumen diameter in the side branch ostium (p = 0.06), lesion length (p = 0.09) and percent diameter stenosis (p = 0.07) of the side branch. Regarding angiographic restenosis in the side branch, predictors were: minimum lumen area in the side branch ostium at final procedure (p = 0.03), treatment with double stenting (p = 0.02), minimum lumen diameter (p = 0.03) and percent diameter stenosis (p = 0.02) in the side branch ostium at final procedure, acute gain at the side branch ostium (p = 0.09) and side branch reference diameter (p = 0.03). These results suggest that complex coronary bifurcation lesions may benefit from a primary percutaneous approach with double stenting strategy, given that most such benefit was associated with a larger lumen area obtained at the side branch ostium.

ASSUNTO(S)

angioplastia transluminal percutânea aterosclerose coronária contenedores coronary bifurcation lesion; ultrassonography; containers; percutaneous transluminal; coronary angio lesão coronária em bifurcação ultrassonografia

ACESSO AO ARTIGO

Documentos Relacionados