A argumentação filosófica: Chaim Perelman e o auditório universal
AUTOR(ES)
Marco Antonio Sousa Alves
DATA DE PUBLICAÇÃO
2005
RESUMO
The present thesis aims to investigate Perelman´s proposal of a New Rhetoric, and by doing so, it intends to achieve a better understanding of philosophical discourse. The most important objectives of this work are: defining the fundamental concepts and distinctions of a new theory of argumentation; investigating the specificity of philosophical argumentation - through the clarification of the concept of universal audience -: and finnally analyzing the relationship between persuading and convincing and between contextualism and universalism - establishing, therefore, the Perelman´s place in the contemporany debate concerning argumentation. It is pointed out the closeness between Perelman´s and Haberman´s thoughts, as well as the distance between Perelman´s thinking and Rorty´s and Apel´s. It is shown how, depending of the point of view - if it is internal or external to the audience -, philosophy can be regarded as a discourse bounded by a given context or, on the othrer hand, as an open argumentation aiming at the universal.
ASSUNTO(S)
perelman, chaim, 1912- retórica teses. filosofia teses. argumentação teses.
ACESSO AO ARTIGO
http://hdl.handle.net/1843/ARBZ-7FXHZADocumentos Relacionados
- ARGUMENT, ARGUMENTATION AND UNIVERSAL AUDIENCE: THE NEW RHETORIC OF PERELMAN
- A teoria da argumentação de Chaim Perelman
- A separação corpo-alma e a tranquilidade filosófica: um estudo sobre o "Fedon" de Platão
- Justificação democrática da atividade jurisdicional : o contributo da lógica jurídica de Chaïm Perelman
- A proposta de reforma do ensino jurídico em Chaïm Perelman e reflexões sobre sua aplicação no Brasil